Object
VALP Main Modifications
Representation ID: 3286
Received: 17/12/2019
Respondent: Jones Lang LaSalle
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
We suggest and propose the following replacement wording:
i. Be planned in a manner which responds to the historic significance of the site, using a heritage-led approach to preserve the significance of heritage assets and their settings, whilst ensuring viable uses consistent with their conservation.
j. Provision of sufficient quantity and quality of sport and recreation provision commensurate to the need generated by the new development.
There is no distinction between the treatment of designated and non-designated heritage assets. There is no statutory requirement to enhance special interest, in respect of listed buildings (officer summary)
We suggest and propose the following replacement wording:
i. Be planned in a manner which responds to the historic significance of the site, using a heritage-led approach to preserve the significance of heritage assets and their settings, whilst ensuring viable uses consistent with their conservation.
j. Provision of sufficient quantity and quality of sport and recreation provision commensurate to the need generated by the new development.
See attached document which is submitted on behalf of the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO)