Aylesbury Vale Area

3.23

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

VALP Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 353

Received: 05/12/2017

Respondent: Mr Phil Yerby

Representation Summary:

Weston Turville and Aylesbury are already linked at the Holiday Inn with the development of Broughton Crossing and further expansion across New Road. Any development that brings housing further south along New Road should be resisted (including Hampden Fields)
The same is the case for Hampden Hall where the gap is less than 100 yards already. It seems to lack significant credibility to have a statement such as this when the council openly support schemes which coalesce with settlements.

Full text:

Weston Turville and Aylesbury are already linked at the Holiday Inn with the development of Broughton Crossing and further expansion across New Road. Any development that brings housing further south along New Road should be resisted (including Hampden Fields)
The same is the case for Hampden Hall where the gap is less than 100 yards already. It seems to lack significant credibility to have a statement such as this when the council openly support schemes which coalesce with settlements.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 428

Received: 12/12/2017

Respondent: Hampden Fields Action Group

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Weston Turville and Aylesbury are already linked at the Holiday Inn with the development (ex-MDA site) of Broughton Crossing and further 2 approved developments across New Road. Any development that brings housing further south along New Road should be resisted (including Hampden Fields). The same scenario is the case for Hampden Hall where the gap is less than 100 yards already. It is beyond comprehension to have a statement such as this when the AVDC openly support schemes which coalesce Aylesbury with village settlements.

Full text:

Weston Turville and Aylesbury are already linked at the Holiday Inn with the development (ex-MDA site) of Broughton Crossing and further 2 approved developments across New Road. Any development that brings housing further south along New Road should be resisted (including Hampden Fields). The same scenario is the case for Hampden Hall where the gap is less than 100 yards already. It is beyond comprehension to have a statement such as this when the AVDC openly support schemes which coalesce Aylesbury with village settlements.

Support

VALP Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 680

Received: 13/12/2017

Respondent: Whaddon Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Whaddon PC fully support - see previous representation which also applies to this paragraph.

Full text:

Whaddon PC fully support - see previous representation which also applies to this paragraph.

Support

VALP Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2090

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Historic England welcomes and supports the commitments to protecting the character (and setting) of settlements in Policy S3 and its supporting paragraphs as part of the positive strategy for conserving and enjoying, and clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.