Aylesbury Vale Area

MM011

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

VALP Main Modifications

Representation ID: 2962

Received: 12/12/2019

Respondent: S G Raven

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation:

In his Interim Findings (ED166, 27 Aug 2019), the Examiner commented on the disproportionately small role of the villages as compared with the disproportionate dominance of Aylesbury, as exhibited in the figures in Table 1. Although there is some readjustment, principally in the contribution from the area immediately adjacent to Milton Keynes, the disproportionality otherwise remains.

Change suggested by respondent:

The total of Allocations in Plan is 7148 (rather than 5998).

Full text:

In his Interim Findings (ED166, 27 Aug 2019), the Examiner commented on the disproportionately small role of the villages as compared with the disproportionate dominance of Aylesbury, as exhibited in the figures in Table 1. Although there is some readjustment, principally in the contribution from the area immediately adjacent to Milton Keynes, the disproportionality otherwise remains.

Object

VALP Main Modifications

Representation ID: 2986

Received: 12/12/2019

Respondent: Arnold White Estates

Agent: Arrow Planning Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation:

The spatial strategy distribution as expressed in MM011, 012 demonstrates a huge
imbalance. The Aylesbury share of that is 55%, the 'large villages' accommodate 7.5%.
Waddesdon is one such 'large village' with extensive services, facilities, a major tourist
attraction (Waddesdon Manor) and a major employment site close by. The need for a
more dispersed pattern of development would be served at the site north of Waddesdon
which has been master-planned.

Change suggested by respondent:

Encourage a wider dispersal of development in the larger village rural settlements, giving Waddesdon as an example.

Full text:

On behalf of my client Arnold White Estates Ltd I attach our representations on the forms provided. I draw your attention to the difficulty I have found in making these submissions. The Schedule of Modifications does not show the relevant page numbers in the Plan as proposed to be modified, which means cross-referencing is very difficult. For example, in the Modifications Schedule MM027 shows a modification to para 4.7 at p62. The Modified Plan shows this as para 4.9 at p67. The Modification Schedule and the Modified Plan should have the same page and paragraph numbers. Also, for example, there are two Policies D2. In the forms I have sought to group linked Main Modifications on one form where a combined response is then provided. Where necessary I have inserted a blank page to accommodate text that would not fit within the box provided. I trust all of my text will be captured.