Aylesbury Vale Area

MM089

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

VALP Main Modifications

Representation ID: 2798

Received: 03/12/2019

Respondent: Land and Partners Ltd

Representation:

We support all these changes. We are the promoters of the most accessible parts of WIN001 and the changes reflect the latest delivery position and progress with the pending planning applications.

Full text:

We support all these changes. We are the promoters of the most accessible parts of WIN001 and the changes reflect the latest delivery position and progress with the pending planning applications.

Support

VALP Main Modifications

Representation ID: 2973

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Crevichon Properties Ltd

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation:

We support the reduction of housing numbers at site WIN001 from 585 to 315 homes. It has become clear through the current outline applications for the site, which if approved amount to a maximum of 355 new homes, that the WIN001 allocation was never going to achieve the numbers suggested and therefore this change is necessary and agreed.

Full text:

We support the reduction of housing numbers at site WIN001 from 585 to 315 homes. It has become clear through the current outline applications for the site, which if approved amount to a maximum of 355 new homes, that the WIN001 allocation was never going to achieve the numbers suggested and therefore this change is necessary and agreed.

Object

VALP Main Modifications

Representation ID: 3358

Received: 08/01/2020

Respondent: Amarillo Ltd & Scandale Ltd

Agent: Planning Prospects

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation:

Overall, the allocation of WIN001 is supported. However, MM089 unnecessarily restricts the development opportunity here and will further restrict development to the north if that is needed in the future (as anticipated). MM089 is counter-productive to deliver the housing requirement set out in the Plan and fails to properly reflect the Plan's settlement hierarchy or Winslow's capacity to accommodate growth going forward. Matters relating to the proposed layout (such as ecology buffer and areas of no development) should be left for consideration through the determination of a planning application.

Change suggested by respondent:

Allocation WIN001 should be reinstated to deliver a larger number of homes (at least 585 as drafted previously); and reference to areas where there should be no development, and the ecological buffer to the north, should be removed.

Full text:

Please see attachments.

Object

VALP Main Modifications

Representation ID: 3653

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Gladman Developments Ltd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation:

Objections to the proposed phasing
which restricts the majority of delivery on this site to 2023 and beyond remain.No evidence has been provided and therefore the proposed
phasing should be removed.
criterion d) which sought to restrict
built form beyond the watercourse, the new wording proposed is not justified. There is no evidence to justify restricting built development as shown on the
proposals map within these locations. To do so could also lead to difficulties in achieving the
quantum of housing proposed on the allocation or lead to an inappropriately high-density
development.

Change suggested by respondent:

the proposed
phasing should be removed.
change to criterion d) recommend that this wording is removed.

Full text:

see attachment