Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Historic England search

New search New search

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D1 Delivering Aylesbury Garden Town

Representation ID: 2096

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

we would prefer "conserve or enhance" as terminology more consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework and as recognising that sensitive change can take place whilst maintaining or even enhancing the historic environment . We would also prefer the principle to read ".......the significance of heritage assets and their setting".

In addition, the reference to mitigation implies some harm to heritage assets, both in the first instance and residually, which would be contrary to the principle of preserving (or conserving) and enhancing such assets. We therefore suggest omitting "including through mitigation as required".

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

4.37

Representation ID: 2098

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

the Master Plan SPD for South Aylesbury should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with the synthesis of any existing archaeological investigations and further archaeological investigation if necessary, and we would expect the retention and enhancement of historic landscape features and archaeological remains to be a place-shaping principle in accordance with the protection afforded to such assets by the National Planning Policy Framework,

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D-AGT1 South Aylesbury

Representation ID: 2099

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

the Master Plan for the site should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with the synthesis of any existing archaeological investigations and further archaeological investigation if necessary, with the conservation of historic landscape features and archaeological remains a site-specific requirement.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Support

VALP Proposed Submission

4.43

Representation ID: 2100

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Historic England welcomes the recognition of the two listed buildings on the South West Aylesbury site and Hartwell House Historic Park and Garden, Hartwell Conservation Area and numerous listed buildings to the west of the site, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

4.47

Representation ID: 2101

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

the Master Plan SPD for South West Aylesbury should provide for the retention and maintenance of a suitable setting for the two listed buildings to the south-east of the site and take account of the setting of Hartwell House and Hartwell Conservation Area and listed buildings to the west. These should be a place-making principle as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework and in compliance with principle j of Policy D1.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

4.49

Representation ID: 2104

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

it should also be derived, in part at least, from the need to retain an appropriate setting for the Grade II listed Hall End Farmhouse and Stoke Cottage, Hartwell House, Hartwell Conservation Area and the other listed buildings to the west.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D-AGT2 South west Aylesbury

Representation ID: 2105

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Master Plan should provide for the retention and maintenance of a suitable setting for the two listed buildings to the south-east of the site and take account of the setting of Hartwell House and Hartwell Conservation Area and listed buildings to the west. This should be a site-specific requirement.

In addition, the Master Plan for the site should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with the synthesis of any existing archaeological investigations and further archaeological investigation if necessary, with the conservation of historic landscape features and archaeological remains a site-specific requirement.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Support

VALP Proposed Submission

4.56

Representation ID: 2106

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Historic England welcomes the recognition of the Aylesbury Arm of the historic Grand Union Canal with a number of listed bridges to the north of the north of A41 site as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear
strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

4.63

Representation ID: 2107

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

the Master Plan SPD for Aylesbury north of the A41 site should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with further archaeological investigation if necessary, and we would expect the retention and enhancement of historic landscape features and archaeological remains to be a place-shaping principle in accordance with the protection afforded to such assets by the nppf, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 and in compliance with principle j of Policy D1.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

Support

VALP Proposed Submission

4.65

Representation ID: 2108

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

we welcome the reference to the urban extension being derived from the field pattern and landscape features on the South Aylesbury site, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.