VALP Proposed Submission

Object

Representation ID: 2109

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The Master Plan for this site should provide for the retention and maintenance of a suitable setting for these listed structures. In addition, the Master Plan for the site should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with the synthesis of any existing archaeological investigations and further archaeological investigation if necessary, with the conservation of historic landscape features and archaeological remains a site-specific requirement.

Object

Representation ID: 2110

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

the Master Plan should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with further archaeological investigation if necessary, and we would expect the retention and enhancement of historic landscape features and archaeological remains to be a place-shaping principle in accordance with the protection afforded to such assets by the National Planning Policy Framework, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and
enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework and in compliance with principle j of Policy D1.

Support

Representation ID: 2111

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

we welcome the reference to the urban extension being derived from the field pattern and landscape features on the Aylesbury south of A41site, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the NPPF.

Object

Representation ID: 2112

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

the Master Plan for the site should be informed by the Buckinghamshire Historic Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Environment Record, with the synthesis of any existing archaeological investigations and further archaeological investigation if necessary, with the conservation of historic landscape features and archaeological remains a site-specific requirement to ensure their protection in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework and in compliance with principle j of Policy D1.

Support

Representation ID: 2113

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

we welcome the reference to the two specific areas of archaeological interest to be retained, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Object

Representation ID: 2114

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

still consider that the retention of the two specific areas of archaeological interest, with the synthesis of any existing archaeological investigations and further archaeological investigation if necessary, should be a site-specific requirement.

In addition, we note that the site includes the Grade II listed Berryfields Farmhouse and abuts the Deserted Villages and Civil War Earthwork scheduled monument to the east. We are not aware if the existing consents affect these designated assets, but if not the retention of the farmhouse with an appropriate setting and the provision of an appropriate setting for the scheduled monument should also be site-specific requirements.

Support

Representation ID: 2115

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

we welcome the reference in this paragraph to the visible heritage assets on the urban extension site at Kingsbrook, although there may of course also be non-visible heritage assets in the form of buried archaeological remains. We welcome the proposed retention of historic features in accordance with the protection afforded to heritage assets by the National Planning Policy Framework and as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework.

Object

Representation ID: 2116

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

outline planning permission has already been granted for the Kingsbrook site and that reserved matters consent has been granted for two of the "villages". However, we would still welcome the retention and enhancement of historic landscape features and archaeological remains to be a site-specific requirement in accordance with the protection afforded to such assets by the National Planning Policy Framework, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework and in compliance with principle j of Policy D1.

Object

Representation ID: 2117

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

according to our records of designated heritage assets, this site includes the Grade II listed Ardenham House. There should therefore be a specific criterion requiring the retention of this building as part of criterion d of Policy D-AYL032, which we otherwise welcome as providing protection for heritage assets in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework and as being in accordance with Policy D1.

Object

Representation ID: 2119

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

welcome criterion f requiring a heritage impact assessment, as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the Framework, although the criterion should require the redevelopment proposals to be informed by the assessment.