Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Jackson Planning search

New search New search

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S9 Monitoring and review

Representation ID: 1055

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Jackson Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

As set out elsewhere in representations the plan completely fails to recognise the on-going work by the National
Infrastructure Commission (NIC) to accommodate over a million new homes in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford arc.
There needs to be greater acknowledgement about the role Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) must play in shaping
the future of the city as part of the 2050 spatial vision and the plan needs a specific policy that deals with how this will be
accommodated until 2033 which is the time period for the plan.

Full text:

Please find attached representations and a supporting appendix in respect of the Regulation 19 consultation on the VALP.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

3.80

Representation ID: 2467

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Jackson Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The plan completely fails to recognise the on-going work by the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) to accommodate
over a million new homes in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford arc. There needs to be greater acknowledgement about
the role Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) must play in shaping the future of the city as part of the 2050 spatial vision
and the plan needs a specific policy that deals with how this will be accommodated until 2033 which is the time period for the
plan.

Full text:

Please find attached representations and a supporting appendix in respect of the Regulation 19 consultation on the VALP.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D-NLV001 Salden Chase

Representation ID: 2468

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Jackson Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The plan completely fails to recognise the on-going work by the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) to accommodate
over a million new homes in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford arc. There needs to be greater acknowledgement about
the role Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) must play in shaping the future of the city as part of the 2050 spatial vision
and the plan needs a specific policy that deals with how this will be accommodated until 2033 which is the time period for the
plan.

Full text:

Please find attached representations and a supporting appendix in respect of the Regulation 19 consultation on the VALP.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S3 Settlement hierarchy and cohesive development

Representation ID: 2469

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Jackson Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

There needs to be greater acknowledgement about
the role Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) must play in shaping the future of the city as part of the 2050 spatial vision
and the plan needs a specific policy that deals with how this will be accommodated until 2033 which is the time period for the
plan.
See also response to Section1 of the plan.
The plan is not effective as it does not consider or flag the major potential identified by the NIC within the plan period to
double the rate of house-building within in the arc.

Full text:

Please find attached representations and a supporting appendix in respect of the Regulation 19 consultation on the VALP.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S5 Infrastructure

Representation ID: 2470

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Jackson Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The plan completely fails to recognise the on-going work by the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) to accommodate
over a million new homes in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford arc. There needs to be greater acknowledgement about
the role Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) must play in shaping the future of the city as part of the 2050 spatial vision
and the plan needs a specific policy that deals with how this will be accommodated until 2033 which is the time period for the
plan.

Full text:

Please find attached representations and a supporting appendix in respect of the Regulation 19 consultation on the VALP.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

1.8

Representation ID: 2471

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Jackson Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The plan completely fails to recognise the on-going work by the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) to accommodate
over a million new homes in the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford arc. There needs to be greater acknowledgement about
the role Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) must play in shaping the future of the city as part of the 2050 spatial vision
and the plan needs a specific policy that deals with how this will be accommodated until 2033 which is the time period for the
plan.

Full text:

Please find attached representations and a supporting appendix in respect of the Regulation 19 consultation on the VALP.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.