Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Coda Planning search

New search New search

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

1.8

Representation ID: 1038

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Coda Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

However, when taking into account DCLG's proposed
new standardised approach to calculating OAN based on local housing
affordability, this changes substantially. When viewed through this new lens, the
OAN set out in the VALP could see a potential increase of up to 55%. This
dramatic shift would without doubt impact significantly on the soundness of the
Plan in its current form, and this will be discussed in greater detail in a later
section of this documen

Full text:

above please find attached a representation to the VALP proposed submission making comments on the general approach to delivering the OAN with specific reference to the settlement of Ickford.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D2 Proposals for non-allocated sites at strategic settlements, larger villages and medium villages

Representation ID: 2546

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Coda Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

the proposed retreat from the level of
residential development that the settlement can support is inappropriate. The
Framework sets out that for a Local Plan to be sound it must deliver sustainable
development commensurate with what can be sustainably accommodated,
and with the OAN. In this case that means allocating a greater level of
development within Ickford and in light of the above the Proposed Submission
version of the VALP represents a step backwards away from 'soundness'

Full text:

above please find attached a representation to the VALP proposed submission making comments on the general approach to delivering the OAN with specific reference to the settlement of Ickford.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

1.13

Representation ID: 2547

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Coda Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Alongside the above discussion, it is further evident that there remains some
doubt as to the accuracy of the overall level of dwellings targeted to be
delivered within Aylesbury Vale over the plan period.

Full text:

above please find attached a representation to the VALP proposed submission making comments on the general approach to delivering the OAN with specific reference to the settlement of Ickford.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D-ICK004 Land off Turnfields

Representation ID: 2548

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Coda Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

in deeming ICK004
suitable for development the HELAA does not provide any positive justification as
to why this is the case. While this raises concerns as to the rationale behind its
allocation, by itself a lack of rigorous assessment does not necessarily mean it
isn't suitable as it is claimed to be. However it is apparent that, even through a
cursory assessment, a number of the reasons given for the competing sites being
unsuitable also apply to ICK004.

Full text:

above please find attached a representation to the VALP proposed submission making comments on the general approach to delivering the OAN with specific reference to the settlement of Ickford.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.