Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Tingewick Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

4.152

Representation ID: 464

Received: 07/12/2017

Respondent: Tingewick Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Having discussed this at the Tingewick Parish Council meeting we believe this wording to be unsound. Reference to lack of information on suitable access is just one of many reasons that SHLAA did not allocate these sites. To just make reference to access is incorrect and completely misleading.

Full text:

Having discussed this at the Tingewick Parish Council meeting we believe this wording to be unsound. Reference to lack of information on suitable access is just one of many reasons that SHLAA did not allocate these sites. To just make reference to access is incorrect and completely misleading.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

4.154

Representation ID: 465

Received: 07/12/2017

Respondent: Tingewick Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

This is extremely poorly worded. What is meant by "sites allocated are not coming forward at the rate anticipated." Would land banking by developers or in-ability to move forward due to agreeing s106 agreements would this allow then other unallocated sites be gained? The 5 year land supply is currently showing 9 years we should not require this clause.

Full text:

This is extremely poorly worded. What is meant by "sites allocated are not coming forward at the rate anticipated." Would land banking by developers or in-ability to move forward due to agreeing s106 agreements would this allow then other unallocated sites be gained? The 5 year land supply is currently showing 9 years we should not require this clause.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

9.32

Representation ID: 466

Received: 07/12/2017

Respondent: Tingewick Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

How can a landscape assessment be carried out with onsite fieldwork? Without carrying out fieldwork it is impossible to accurately undertake this assessment. The fact that this already needs to be reviewed shows it is not fit for purpose.

Full text:

How can a landscape assessment be carried out with onsite fieldwork? Without carrying out fieldwork it is impossible to accurately undertake this assessment. The fact that this already needs to be reviewed shows it is not fit for purpose.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

9.27

Representation ID: 467

Received: 07/12/2017

Respondent: Tingewick Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We do not believe a valid reason for not allocating a site as a AAL because AVDC does not wish to have many sites is a sound reason. Further more detailed investigation should be undertaken before declassifying sites. A detailed review in 2017 was not undertaken but reliance on 2008 information which is out of date. We believe that the area around Tingewick should be designated as a AAL and would ask for this to be reviewed. There has also been no consultation with neighbouring councils which is a mistake given the designated area borders other councils.

Full text:

We do not believe a valid reason for not allocating a site as a AAL because AVDC does not wish to have many sites is a sound reason. Further more detailed investigation should be undertaken before declassifying sites. A detailed review in 2017 was not undertaken but reliance on 2008 information which is out of date. We believe that the area around Tingewick should be designated as a AAL and would ask for this to be reviewed. There has also been no consultation with neighbouring councils which is a mistake given the designated area borders other councils.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.