Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Hallam Land Management search

New search New search

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

2.4

Representation ID: 1134

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

In short, a positive and aspirational growth orientated spatial vision should form the basis for the development of the more detailed polices of the VALP. This would satisfy the requirements of the NPPF, respond to the economic and underlying trends in the area, respond to the Oxford-MK-Cambridge Growth and infrastructure Opportunities and drive the agenda for all agencies involved in its implementation and best meet the needs of all sections of the community.

Full text:

Aylesbury related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

2.6

Representation ID: 2562

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The spatial strategy should provide a further and particular recognition of the role of Buckingham in the vision for the District.
Aylesbury Garden Town is now prioritised as the first location for growth in the District.
In contrast Buckingham is treated in the same terms as Haddenham Winslow and Wendover (and other settlements). The approach is one of constraint and does not reflect the positive vision or opportunities for the town.

The importance of prioritising development at both Aylesbury and Buckingham ahead of other settlements and locations is necessary for the Plan to be sound and positively prepared and effective.

Full text:

Aylesbury related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S2 Spatial Strategy for Growth

Representation ID: 2563

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Hallam Land Management has substantial concerns regarding the scale of development proposed in in Policy S2 - which does not accord with OAN of the District or make adequate allowance for the unmet needs of other districts in accordance with the Duty to Co-operate.

Moreover HLM is concerned that the provision made for Buckingham in particular but also potentially Aylesbury is not positively prepared or effective in terms of meeting the aspirations of the Plan. The provision should be increased.

Full text:

Aylesbury related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S3 Settlement hierarchy and cohesive development

Representation ID: 2564

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Given the importance of delivering an increase in housing opportunity in the District and to meet the housing requirements of AVDC and the unmet need from other areas, it is important that the policy allows for sustainable development opportunities to come forward during the plan and notwithstanding the provision made in the plan for new allocations. As such the need for Policy is questioned. In any event it needs to be amended to be robust.

Full text:

Aylesbury related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

D1 Delivering Aylesbury Garden Town

Representation ID: 2697

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Policy D1 is not sound. It fails to provide the positive approach to planning required by the scale of housing need in the area. It is ineffective in that provision is not made for the delivery of necessary infrastructure to support the strategy and includes a range of sites that will not be effective in delivering the scale of development and pipeline of development required in Aylesbury. It is not justified in that the evidence base underpinning the choice of sites and the rejection of others, is neither robust nor necessarily leading to the conclusions drawn in the VALP.

Full text:

Aylesbury related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

2.4

Representation ID: 2698

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

In short, a positive and aspirational growth orientated spatial vision should form the basis for the development of the more detailed polices of the VALP. This would satisfy the requirements of the NPPF, respond to the economic and underlying trends in the area, respond to the Oxford-MK-Cambridge Growth and infrastructure Opportunities and drive the agenda for all agencies involved in its implementation and best meet the needs of all sections of the community.

Full text:

Buckingham related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

2.6

Representation ID: 2699

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The spatial strategy should provide a further and particular recognition of the role of Buckingham in the vision for the District. Aylesbury Garden Town is now prioritised as the first location for growth in the District. In contrast Buckingham is treated in the same terms as Haddenham Winslow and Wendover (and other settlements). The approach is one of constraint and does not reflect the positive vision or opportunities for the town. The importance of prioritising development at both Aylesbury and Buckingham ahead of other settlements and locations is necessary for the Plan to be sound and positively prepared and effective.

Full text:

Buckingham related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S2 Spatial Strategy for Growth

Representation ID: 2700

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Hallam Land Management has substantial concerns regarding the scale of development proposed in in Policy S2 - which does not accord with OAN of the District or make adequate allowance for the unmet needs of other districts in accordance with the Duty to Co-operate. Moreover HLM is concerned that the provision made for Buckingham in particular but also potentially Aylesbury is not positively prepared or effective in terms of meeting the aspirations of the Plan. The provision should be increased.

Full text:

Buckingham related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S3 Settlement hierarchy and cohesive development

Representation ID: 2701

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Proposed Policy S3 appears to replicate policy RA2 of the adopted AVLP. There the policy was included in the rural areas section of the Plan. The Policy should be amended to address such rural issues and focus on development within the open countryside rather than coalescence. It is important that the policy allows for sustainable development opportunities to come forward during the plan and notwithstanding the provision made in the plan for new allocations.

Full text:

Buckingham related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

Object

VALP Proposed Submission

S8 Neighbourhood plans

Representation ID: 2702

Received: 14/12/2017

Respondent: Hallam Land Management

Agent: David Lock Associates

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Hallam understands the aim of the Policy S8 to allow Neighbourhood Plans the opportunity to progress sites to deliver the housing requirement set out in the Local Plan. Hallam supports this objective but is concerned that the aim may be frustrated by the alternative policies of the VALP - not least of which includes the allocation of specific sites in Neighbourhood Plan Areas - thereby prejudging the NP process in key parts of the District. Amendments are necessary to secure soundness.

Full text:

Buckingham related representations. Please see attached form for full representations.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.