Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Main Modifications

Search Representations

Results for Newton Longville Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM292

Representation ID: 3608

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is proposed to modify the Housing Trajectory for Newton Longville from 48
to 53. We contend this is based on a miscalculation by AVDC by including
one site twice (it was first approved for 3 dwellings and then for 4), the
correct figure would be 50, not 53. Whilst in overall numbers overcounting by 3 is not significant, it must give rise to concerns about the accuracy and robustness of other
detail in the Housing Trajectory particularly as no definitive list appears to exist of the sites utilised to calculate the figures.

Change suggested by respondent:

Justify the housing trajectory with evidence

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM003

Representation ID: 3609

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Given the passage of time since the OAN (objective assessment of housing
need) was carried out, AVDC should be required to ensure the OAN is
informed by the latest available information and whether is gives rise to
meaningful change as well as how requirement should be apportioned
between different Housing Market Areas.

Change suggested by respondent:

Revise OAN and housing figures in plan

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM014

Representation ID: 3610

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Many of the Main Modifications appear to be designed protect the villages
surrounding Aylesbury and to prevent coalescence, whilst at the same time
promoting coalescence with Newton Longville, Whaddon and communities in
Milton Keynes particularly Oxley Park, Kingsmead, Tattenhoe and Bletchley.
AVDC seem to hark back to the South East Plan as if it is justification for
allocating sites close to Milton Keynes this is neither sound nor justified.
There should not be such double standards and villages in the north of the
district must be offered the same protection from coalescence as the south.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove the allocation

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM010

Representation ID: 3611

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Several Main Modifications propose altering allocations from "around x" to
"at least". We contend that is unsound as it is not sufficiently precise and for
example in the case of D-WHA001 could lead to the policy being read as
supporting 1,800 dwellings which is what the developers contend should be
on the site.

Change suggested by respondent:

Change 'at least' to 'around' throughout the plan's policies

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM297

Representation ID: 3616

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

A new Appendix F "Schedule of Saved Policies replaced by VALP" is added
which amongst other things includes removal of saved policy RA.35
"Safeguarded road corridor at Newton Longville" in the 2004 Local Plan
without any replacement with the commentary "Little/no possibility of
implementation in VALP no route identified or agreed/safeguarded -
uncertainty over Expressway route Policy Redundant." There has been no
consultation of this and indeed a safeguarded route has been required within
the Salden Chase application.

Change suggested by respondent:

Reinstate safeguarded road

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM074

Representation ID: 3618

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The amendments are not sound as there is already a resolution to approve the site application subject to Section 106 agreement (June 2017). Furthermore, the site still has not received full approval and now Milton Keynes Council have rejected the cross-boundary application. Without approval by Milton Keynes Council the development may not proceed and the allocation is neither justified or sound.

The proposed modification on "Expected time of delivery" indicates how little reliance can be placed on AVDC's housing trajectory. It is clear AVDC have little idea when particular sites are going to be delivered.

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM076

Representation ID: 3631

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: Newton Longville Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Inspector should re-open the public examination. The allocation of Shenley Park should be removed from the plan. Discussions between AVDC and MK do not satisfy the legal duty. Referring to 1,150 conceals the site promoter pushing for 1,800 houses. No provision for employment. No references to policy SD15 in Plan:MK. Transport needs for Shenley Park have not been properly considered. Shenley Park should include construction (not just safeguarding) of a bypass from the A421 to the A4146 Detailed policies for sites should be within VALP, not left to be in an SPD.
Not clear how evidence led to the decision of site. The SA appears to have been produced after decision on which site. (officer summary)

Full text:

See attachment for full comments and all issues raised

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.