Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Main Modifications

Search Representations

Results for AVDC Councillor search

New search New search

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM083

Representation ID: 3085

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: AVDC Councillor

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Buckingham Town Council Neighbourhood Plan allocates this site (site M) and contributes towards the delivery of the important A421/A422 link road as per the Buckingham Transport Strategy,

Change suggested by respondent:

Reinstate allocation

Full text:

Buckingham Town Council Neighbourhood Plan allocates this site (site M) and contributes towards the delivery of the important A421/A422 link road as per the Buckingham Transport Strategy,

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM101

Representation ID: 3089

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: AVDC Councillor

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Village facilities are not as assumed in the planning application or the HEELA submission. HELAA v4, which deemed site MMO006 as 'suitable' for 170 houses, was used as supporting evidence for the allocation of site MMO006 in the Submission VALP and this change from v3 is not evidence based, and calls into question the general soundness of the approach to identifying the allocation. The late addition in the errata document of "at least" 170 houses is also not evidenced.

Change suggested by respondent:

Omit allocation

Full text:

Village facilities are not as assumed in the planning application or the HEELA submission. HELAA v4, which deemed site MMO006 as 'suitable' for 170 houses, was used as supporting evidence for the allocation of site MMO006 in the Submission VALP and this change from v3 is not evidence based, and calls into question the general soundness of the approach to identifying the allocation. The late addition in the errata document of "at least" 170 houses is also not evidenced.

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM210

Representation ID: 3090

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: AVDC Councillor

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

The Buckingham Transport Strategy has some very useful proposals which I see are included in this updated paragraph, but two key items are missing: The A421/A422 link road and the west street/town centre environmental improvements.

Change suggested by respondent:

Add these elements of the BTS to this paragraph.

Full text:

The Buckingham Transport Strategy has some very useful proposals which I see are included in this updated paragraph, but two key items are missing: The A421/A422 link road and the west street/town centre environmental improvements.

Support

VALP Main Modifications

MM218

Representation ID: 3091

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: AVDC Councillor

Representation Summary:

However, supermarkets and locations with dwell times of circa 1-2 hours should also have 7kW charging for Plug-in hybrids which can't use Rapid 50kW + machines. New homes should include cabling provision but home owners must be allowed to choose their own 7kW charger unit to suit personal preference (in terms of flexibility for connection to in-house batteries, solar, off-peak and smart capabilities).

Full text:

However, supermarkets and locations with dwell times of circa 1-2 hours should also have 7kW charging for Plug-in hybrids which can't use Rapid 50kW + machines. New homes should include cabling provision but home owners must be allowed to choose their own 7kW charger unit to suit personal preference (in terms of flexibility for connection to in-house batteries, solar, off-peak and smart capabilities).

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM271

Representation ID: 3092

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: AVDC Councillor

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

The clause on 10 homes or gross area of 1000sqm creates confusion on how this policy will be implemented. Clarity is needed so that any development over 10 units contributes in some way to the required infrastructure. The unit size may partially impact on the number of residents, but this should not exclude developments completely contributions.

Change suggested by respondent:

Delete size requirement.

Full text:

The clause on 10 homes or gross area of 1000sqm creates confusion on how this policy will be implemented. Clarity is needed so that any development over 10 units contributes in some way to the required infrastructure. The unit size may partially impact on the number of residents, but this should not exclude developments completely contributions.

Object

VALP Main Modifications

MM293

Representation ID: 3093

Received: 17/12/2019

Respondent: AVDC Councillor

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

The size of parking spaces is based on an old outdated 2.4 x 4.8m standard. It does not take into account the proposed county council parking bay size standard.

Change suggested by respondent:

Consider a suitable standard for 2020 such as that proposed in the county council parking standard.

Full text:

The size of parking spaces is based on an old outdated 2.4 x 4.8m standard. It does not take into account the proposed county council parking bay size standard.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.