Aylesbury Vale Area

VALP Further Main Modifications

Search Representations

Results for The Buckingham Society search

New search New search

Object

VALP Further Main Modifications

FMM059

Representation ID: 4099

Received: 07/02/2021

Respondent: The Buckingham Society

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

BUC043 not consistent with BNDP, the only legally made development plan for Buckingham. The site cannot deliver sustainable housing growth; the relative high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries severe risk of pollution since waste water treatments are at capacity and “reference to consultation with the water and sewerage undertaker” does not adequately mitigate against anticipated pollution.

Change suggested by respondent:

Consultation on the specific matters of waste water and sewerage should be undertaken with the Town council in conjunction with the relevant utilities undertaker. Further traffic modelling is required to assess the combined increases in traffic from ALL developments that will be expected to use Moreton Road, A413 into the town centre.

Full text:

FMM059

BUC043 (Moreton Road, Phase III)
The Society has consistently opposed the inclusion of this site in VALP. It did not form part of the development plan in the adopted Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and a previous application was rejected at appeal by the Planning Inspectorate. It cannot deliver sustainable housing growth, as can be understood from the many objections to the planning application validated on 11th February 2020 and without major infrastructure mitigation, no development is possible within the plan period.
Pollution: It is acknowledged that the relative high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries a severe risk of pollution since current waste water treatments are at capacity and necessitate major works to prevent pollution. The inclusion of “reference to consultation with the water and sewerage undertaker” does not adequately mitigate against anticipated pollution.
Transport:ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
3.If the modelling is predicting a 25% increase in flows eastwards from the Moreton Road/High Street junction, the A422 will be subject to long queues at the approaches from both Stratford Road and Mill Lane*.
4.Why is it assumed that all traffic emanating from site BUC051 will flow through the town centre? The Brackley Road (A422 westwards) is a likely route, leading as it does to the Silverstone Enterprise Zone.
5. Both BUC043 and MMO006 are approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic. By contrast, site BUC051 could initiate an attractive, flat, pedestrian/cycle access via the riverside walks.
6. There is equally (if not worse) significant on street parking along the Moreton Road further exacerbating the queuing traffic from an easterly direction.
* Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM003

Buckingham is expected to accommodate additional growth (2,177 houses) without any indication of the associated infrastructure that will be required to service this growth.
Sustainable growth is not justified without sustainable transport links. This requires public transport that is easily accessible without the use of the car. In the light of the recent confirmed financial support for the East-West Rail link, which will offer a real alternative to the car, the Society calls for a re-directed balance of housing towards Winslow. The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated in Winslow, and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to a more sustainable location.

In the Inspector’s Interim Findings, it is noted that ”growth in the north of the district would lead to increased lengths of commuting flows” and that this is contrary to the NPPF, paragraph 34, which seeks to “ensure that developments which generate significant movement are located where the need to travel will be minimized”.

ED245 Policies Map

Please note this is neither a ‘support’ or ‘object’ matter. It is simply an observation, which leads to the conclusions set out under other responses from The Buckingham Society to this consultation.
Policies Map
It is noticeable when examining the Policies Map for Buckingham and the neighbouring settlement of Maids Moreton (page 5) that allocations BUC043 and MMO006 are located at the furthest edges of Buckingham and Maids Moreton respectively and distanced by some margin from the main employment areas.

The reserved site for Buckingham’s additional cemetery site is not shown. This is a commitment within the Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and marked ‘F’ on Fig.4.2.

FMM072

D-MMO006 Land east of Walnut Drive and west of Foscote Road
Maids Moreton has been wrongly categorized as a “medium” village. For a settlement of a lower order with acknowledged, major transport restraints, the proposed growth of 170 dwellings on this site, now compounded by an additional 12 dwellings on MMO005 (FMM107) is not sustainable. The insertion of the words “at least” further undermines the sustainability of this site. Contrary to FMM067, the village is not “moderately well served with services and facilities”, having only 4 of the 6 criteria cited as a minimum number to qualify as a “medium” village. And, even if it WAS a “medium” village, “at least 170 houses” is in total conflict with FMM015, Policy S2 (h): “growth in medium villages will be at a scale in keeping with the local character and setting. It is also in direct conflict with NPPF, Paragraph 34, since the “significant” movement that will be generated by 170 dwellings outside the settlement boundary of a small village cannot be minimised.
One can observe the ludicrously unbalanced nature of this allocation in FMM068, noting that no other ‘medium’ village is expected to accommodate more than 37 dwellings.
Pollution
As noted under FMM059, the high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries an unacceptable risk of pollution owing to the inadequacy of waste water treatment in the area.
Transport
The SA Addendum report (ED246 9.12.4) considers the “at least 170 houses” to add a further degree of constraint since it is acknowledged that a “larger site at a lower order settlement” will generate significant vehicular movement contrary to NPPF, paragraph 34.
Maids Moreton is approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic.
ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
*Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM096 and FMM103

Policy I4 Flooding
(e) and (i)Noting the changes in FMM103 to “ensure no increase in flood risk on site or elsewhere such as downstream, or upstream receptors, existing development and/or adjacent land” , The Buckingham Society considers that development on the scale envisaged in BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006 would see a significant increase in surface water discharge and lead to even greater flood risks within the Great Ouse catchment area. Calculations for floodplain compensation and volume-for-volume compensation up to the 1% annual probability (1 in 100) are no longer adequate.

FMM096 requires “a new requirement to include detailed modelling of any ordinary watercourses within or adjacent to the site, where appropriate, to define in detail the area at risk of flooding and model the effect of climate change.” This is an important proposal as it can be the case that small streams and ditches shown by the nationally available flood risk dataset to be associated with surface water flood risk can be found to be associated with fluvial flood risk upon further investigation.
There are vast numbers of active springs around the town and it is noticeable that these and related underground watercourses have changed the pattern of surface discharge; so much so that in each of the recent major flood events (1998, 2007 and most recently December 2020), the associated flooding within and without the town has significantly worsened, flooding properties and land that has not seen such volumes of water in previous decades. Should planning applications proceed for sites BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006, further evidence is needed on such matters.

Object

VALP Further Main Modifications

FMM003

Representation ID: 4100

Received: 07/02/2021

Respondent: The Buckingham Society

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

New detailed information, along with committed Government financial support for the East-West rail link, creates more sustainable locations in closer proximity to the new station at Winslow. The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated at Winslow and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to where there is a real alternative to the use of cars.

Change suggested by respondent:

The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated at Winslow and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to where there is a real alternative to the use of cars.

Full text:

FMM059

BUC043 (Moreton Road, Phase III)
The Society has consistently opposed the inclusion of this site in VALP. It did not form part of the development plan in the adopted Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and a previous application was rejected at appeal by the Planning Inspectorate. It cannot deliver sustainable housing growth, as can be understood from the many objections to the planning application validated on 11th February 2020 and without major infrastructure mitigation, no development is possible within the plan period.
Pollution: It is acknowledged that the relative high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries a severe risk of pollution since current waste water treatments are at capacity and necessitate major works to prevent pollution. The inclusion of “reference to consultation with the water and sewerage undertaker” does not adequately mitigate against anticipated pollution.
Transport:ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
3.If the modelling is predicting a 25% increase in flows eastwards from the Moreton Road/High Street junction, the A422 will be subject to long queues at the approaches from both Stratford Road and Mill Lane*.
4.Why is it assumed that all traffic emanating from site BUC051 will flow through the town centre? The Brackley Road (A422 westwards) is a likely route, leading as it does to the Silverstone Enterprise Zone.
5. Both BUC043 and MMO006 are approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic. By contrast, site BUC051 could initiate an attractive, flat, pedestrian/cycle access via the riverside walks.
6. There is equally (if not worse) significant on street parking along the Moreton Road further exacerbating the queuing traffic from an easterly direction.
* Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM003

Buckingham is expected to accommodate additional growth (2,177 houses) without any indication of the associated infrastructure that will be required to service this growth.
Sustainable growth is not justified without sustainable transport links. This requires public transport that is easily accessible without the use of the car. In the light of the recent confirmed financial support for the East-West Rail link, which will offer a real alternative to the car, the Society calls for a re-directed balance of housing towards Winslow. The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated in Winslow, and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to a more sustainable location.

In the Inspector’s Interim Findings, it is noted that ”growth in the north of the district would lead to increased lengths of commuting flows” and that this is contrary to the NPPF, paragraph 34, which seeks to “ensure that developments which generate significant movement are located where the need to travel will be minimized”.

ED245 Policies Map

Please note this is neither a ‘support’ or ‘object’ matter. It is simply an observation, which leads to the conclusions set out under other responses from The Buckingham Society to this consultation.
Policies Map
It is noticeable when examining the Policies Map for Buckingham and the neighbouring settlement of Maids Moreton (page 5) that allocations BUC043 and MMO006 are located at the furthest edges of Buckingham and Maids Moreton respectively and distanced by some margin from the main employment areas.

The reserved site for Buckingham’s additional cemetery site is not shown. This is a commitment within the Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and marked ‘F’ on Fig.4.2.

FMM072

D-MMO006 Land east of Walnut Drive and west of Foscote Road
Maids Moreton has been wrongly categorized as a “medium” village. For a settlement of a lower order with acknowledged, major transport restraints, the proposed growth of 170 dwellings on this site, now compounded by an additional 12 dwellings on MMO005 (FMM107) is not sustainable. The insertion of the words “at least” further undermines the sustainability of this site. Contrary to FMM067, the village is not “moderately well served with services and facilities”, having only 4 of the 6 criteria cited as a minimum number to qualify as a “medium” village. And, even if it WAS a “medium” village, “at least 170 houses” is in total conflict with FMM015, Policy S2 (h): “growth in medium villages will be at a scale in keeping with the local character and setting. It is also in direct conflict with NPPF, Paragraph 34, since the “significant” movement that will be generated by 170 dwellings outside the settlement boundary of a small village cannot be minimised.
One can observe the ludicrously unbalanced nature of this allocation in FMM068, noting that no other ‘medium’ village is expected to accommodate more than 37 dwellings.
Pollution
As noted under FMM059, the high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries an unacceptable risk of pollution owing to the inadequacy of waste water treatment in the area.
Transport
The SA Addendum report (ED246 9.12.4) considers the “at least 170 houses” to add a further degree of constraint since it is acknowledged that a “larger site at a lower order settlement” will generate significant vehicular movement contrary to NPPF, paragraph 34.
Maids Moreton is approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic.
ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
*Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM096 and FMM103

Policy I4 Flooding
(e) and (i)Noting the changes in FMM103 to “ensure no increase in flood risk on site or elsewhere such as downstream, or upstream receptors, existing development and/or adjacent land” , The Buckingham Society considers that development on the scale envisaged in BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006 would see a significant increase in surface water discharge and lead to even greater flood risks within the Great Ouse catchment area. Calculations for floodplain compensation and volume-for-volume compensation up to the 1% annual probability (1 in 100) are no longer adequate.

FMM096 requires “a new requirement to include detailed modelling of any ordinary watercourses within or adjacent to the site, where appropriate, to define in detail the area at risk of flooding and model the effect of climate change.” This is an important proposal as it can be the case that small streams and ditches shown by the nationally available flood risk dataset to be associated with surface water flood risk can be found to be associated with fluvial flood risk upon further investigation.
There are vast numbers of active springs around the town and it is noticeable that these and related underground watercourses have changed the pattern of surface discharge; so much so that in each of the recent major flood events (1998, 2007 and most recently December 2020), the associated flooding within and without the town has significantly worsened, flooding properties and land that has not seen such volumes of water in previous decades. Should planning applications proceed for sites BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006, further evidence is needed on such matters.

Object

VALP Further Main Modifications

FMM107

Representation ID: 4101

Received: 07/02/2021

Respondent: The Buckingham Society

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is noticeable when examining the Policies Map for Buckingham and the neighbouring settlement of Maids Moreton (page 5) that allocations BUC043 and MMO006 are located at the furthest edges of Buckingham and Maids Moreton respectively and distanced by some margin from the main employment areas.

The reserved site for Buckingham’s additional cemetery site is not shown. This is a commitment within the Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and marked ‘F’ on Fig.4.2.

Full text:

FMM059

BUC043 (Moreton Road, Phase III)
The Society has consistently opposed the inclusion of this site in VALP. It did not form part of the development plan in the adopted Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and a previous application was rejected at appeal by the Planning Inspectorate. It cannot deliver sustainable housing growth, as can be understood from the many objections to the planning application validated on 11th February 2020 and without major infrastructure mitigation, no development is possible within the plan period.
Pollution: It is acknowledged that the relative high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries a severe risk of pollution since current waste water treatments are at capacity and necessitate major works to prevent pollution. The inclusion of “reference to consultation with the water and sewerage undertaker” does not adequately mitigate against anticipated pollution.
Transport:ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
3.If the modelling is predicting a 25% increase in flows eastwards from the Moreton Road/High Street junction, the A422 will be subject to long queues at the approaches from both Stratford Road and Mill Lane*.
4.Why is it assumed that all traffic emanating from site BUC051 will flow through the town centre? The Brackley Road (A422 westwards) is a likely route, leading as it does to the Silverstone Enterprise Zone.
5. Both BUC043 and MMO006 are approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic. By contrast, site BUC051 could initiate an attractive, flat, pedestrian/cycle access via the riverside walks.
6. There is equally (if not worse) significant on street parking along the Moreton Road further exacerbating the queuing traffic from an easterly direction.
* Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM003

Buckingham is expected to accommodate additional growth (2,177 houses) without any indication of the associated infrastructure that will be required to service this growth.
Sustainable growth is not justified without sustainable transport links. This requires public transport that is easily accessible without the use of the car. In the light of the recent confirmed financial support for the East-West Rail link, which will offer a real alternative to the car, the Society calls for a re-directed balance of housing towards Winslow. The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated in Winslow, and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to a more sustainable location.

In the Inspector’s Interim Findings, it is noted that ”growth in the north of the district would lead to increased lengths of commuting flows” and that this is contrary to the NPPF, paragraph 34, which seeks to “ensure that developments which generate significant movement are located where the need to travel will be minimized”.

ED245 Policies Map

Please note this is neither a ‘support’ or ‘object’ matter. It is simply an observation, which leads to the conclusions set out under other responses from The Buckingham Society to this consultation.
Policies Map
It is noticeable when examining the Policies Map for Buckingham and the neighbouring settlement of Maids Moreton (page 5) that allocations BUC043 and MMO006 are located at the furthest edges of Buckingham and Maids Moreton respectively and distanced by some margin from the main employment areas.

The reserved site for Buckingham’s additional cemetery site is not shown. This is a commitment within the Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and marked ‘F’ on Fig.4.2.

FMM072

D-MMO006 Land east of Walnut Drive and west of Foscote Road
Maids Moreton has been wrongly categorized as a “medium” village. For a settlement of a lower order with acknowledged, major transport restraints, the proposed growth of 170 dwellings on this site, now compounded by an additional 12 dwellings on MMO005 (FMM107) is not sustainable. The insertion of the words “at least” further undermines the sustainability of this site. Contrary to FMM067, the village is not “moderately well served with services and facilities”, having only 4 of the 6 criteria cited as a minimum number to qualify as a “medium” village. And, even if it WAS a “medium” village, “at least 170 houses” is in total conflict with FMM015, Policy S2 (h): “growth in medium villages will be at a scale in keeping with the local character and setting. It is also in direct conflict with NPPF, Paragraph 34, since the “significant” movement that will be generated by 170 dwellings outside the settlement boundary of a small village cannot be minimised.
One can observe the ludicrously unbalanced nature of this allocation in FMM068, noting that no other ‘medium’ village is expected to accommodate more than 37 dwellings.
Pollution
As noted under FMM059, the high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries an unacceptable risk of pollution owing to the inadequacy of waste water treatment in the area.
Transport
The SA Addendum report (ED246 9.12.4) considers the “at least 170 houses” to add a further degree of constraint since it is acknowledged that a “larger site at a lower order settlement” will generate significant vehicular movement contrary to NPPF, paragraph 34.
Maids Moreton is approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic.
ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
*Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM096 and FMM103

Policy I4 Flooding
(e) and (i)Noting the changes in FMM103 to “ensure no increase in flood risk on site or elsewhere such as downstream, or upstream receptors, existing development and/or adjacent land” , The Buckingham Society considers that development on the scale envisaged in BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006 would see a significant increase in surface water discharge and lead to even greater flood risks within the Great Ouse catchment area. Calculations for floodplain compensation and volume-for-volume compensation up to the 1% annual probability (1 in 100) are no longer adequate.

FMM096 requires “a new requirement to include detailed modelling of any ordinary watercourses within or adjacent to the site, where appropriate, to define in detail the area at risk of flooding and model the effect of climate change.” This is an important proposal as it can be the case that small streams and ditches shown by the nationally available flood risk dataset to be associated with surface water flood risk can be found to be associated with fluvial flood risk upon further investigation.
There are vast numbers of active springs around the town and it is noticeable that these and related underground watercourses have changed the pattern of surface discharge; so much so that in each of the recent major flood events (1998, 2007 and most recently December 2020), the associated flooding within and without the town has significantly worsened, flooding properties and land that has not seen such volumes of water in previous decades. Should planning applications proceed for sites BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006, further evidence is needed on such matters.

Object

VALP Further Main Modifications

FMM072

Representation ID: 4102

Received: 07/02/2021

Respondent: The Buckingham Society

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Maids Moreton has been wrongly categorized as a “medium” village. The insertion of the words “at least” further undermines the sustainability of site MMO006, which totally contradicts Policy S2 and is in direct conflict with NPPF, para 34. As a “lower order settlement”, the village road network cannot support traffic generated by what will now be 182 houses (as per FMM107).Inadequacy of waste water treatment in Buckingham and Maids Moreton.

Change suggested by respondent:

New and important evidence on the detrimental biodiversity impact on this site further undermines its sustainability, which together with the additional requirements to better understand the geomorphology and subsequent distribution of surface water discharges indicate a removal of this allocation in the VALP.

Full text:

FMM059

BUC043 (Moreton Road, Phase III)
The Society has consistently opposed the inclusion of this site in VALP. It did not form part of the development plan in the adopted Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and a previous application was rejected at appeal by the Planning Inspectorate. It cannot deliver sustainable housing growth, as can be understood from the many objections to the planning application validated on 11th February 2020 and without major infrastructure mitigation, no development is possible within the plan period.
Pollution: It is acknowledged that the relative high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries a severe risk of pollution since current waste water treatments are at capacity and necessitate major works to prevent pollution. The inclusion of “reference to consultation with the water and sewerage undertaker” does not adequately mitigate against anticipated pollution.
Transport:ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
3.If the modelling is predicting a 25% increase in flows eastwards from the Moreton Road/High Street junction, the A422 will be subject to long queues at the approaches from both Stratford Road and Mill Lane*.
4.Why is it assumed that all traffic emanating from site BUC051 will flow through the town centre? The Brackley Road (A422 westwards) is a likely route, leading as it does to the Silverstone Enterprise Zone.
5. Both BUC043 and MMO006 are approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic. By contrast, site BUC051 could initiate an attractive, flat, pedestrian/cycle access via the riverside walks.
6. There is equally (if not worse) significant on street parking along the Moreton Road further exacerbating the queuing traffic from an easterly direction.
* Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM003

Buckingham is expected to accommodate additional growth (2,177 houses) without any indication of the associated infrastructure that will be required to service this growth.
Sustainable growth is not justified without sustainable transport links. This requires public transport that is easily accessible without the use of the car. In the light of the recent confirmed financial support for the East-West Rail link, which will offer a real alternative to the car, the Society calls for a re-directed balance of housing towards Winslow. The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated in Winslow, and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to a more sustainable location.

In the Inspector’s Interim Findings, it is noted that ”growth in the north of the district would lead to increased lengths of commuting flows” and that this is contrary to the NPPF, paragraph 34, which seeks to “ensure that developments which generate significant movement are located where the need to travel will be minimized”.

ED245 Policies Map

Please note this is neither a ‘support’ or ‘object’ matter. It is simply an observation, which leads to the conclusions set out under other responses from The Buckingham Society to this consultation.
Policies Map
It is noticeable when examining the Policies Map for Buckingham and the neighbouring settlement of Maids Moreton (page 5) that allocations BUC043 and MMO006 are located at the furthest edges of Buckingham and Maids Moreton respectively and distanced by some margin from the main employment areas.

The reserved site for Buckingham’s additional cemetery site is not shown. This is a commitment within the Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and marked ‘F’ on Fig.4.2.

FMM072

D-MMO006 Land east of Walnut Drive and west of Foscote Road
Maids Moreton has been wrongly categorized as a “medium” village. For a settlement of a lower order with acknowledged, major transport restraints, the proposed growth of 170 dwellings on this site, now compounded by an additional 12 dwellings on MMO005 (FMM107) is not sustainable. The insertion of the words “at least” further undermines the sustainability of this site. Contrary to FMM067, the village is not “moderately well served with services and facilities”, having only 4 of the 6 criteria cited as a minimum number to qualify as a “medium” village. And, even if it WAS a “medium” village, “at least 170 houses” is in total conflict with FMM015, Policy S2 (h): “growth in medium villages will be at a scale in keeping with the local character and setting. It is also in direct conflict with NPPF, Paragraph 34, since the “significant” movement that will be generated by 170 dwellings outside the settlement boundary of a small village cannot be minimised.
One can observe the ludicrously unbalanced nature of this allocation in FMM068, noting that no other ‘medium’ village is expected to accommodate more than 37 dwellings.
Pollution
As noted under FMM059, the high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries an unacceptable risk of pollution owing to the inadequacy of waste water treatment in the area.
Transport
The SA Addendum report (ED246 9.12.4) considers the “at least 170 houses” to add a further degree of constraint since it is acknowledged that a “larger site at a lower order settlement” will generate significant vehicular movement contrary to NPPF, paragraph 34.
Maids Moreton is approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic.
ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
*Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM096 and FMM103

Policy I4 Flooding
(e) and (i)Noting the changes in FMM103 to “ensure no increase in flood risk on site or elsewhere such as downstream, or upstream receptors, existing development and/or adjacent land” , The Buckingham Society considers that development on the scale envisaged in BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006 would see a significant increase in surface water discharge and lead to even greater flood risks within the Great Ouse catchment area. Calculations for floodplain compensation and volume-for-volume compensation up to the 1% annual probability (1 in 100) are no longer adequate.

FMM096 requires “a new requirement to include detailed modelling of any ordinary watercourses within or adjacent to the site, where appropriate, to define in detail the area at risk of flooding and model the effect of climate change.” This is an important proposal as it can be the case that small streams and ditches shown by the nationally available flood risk dataset to be associated with surface water flood risk can be found to be associated with fluvial flood risk upon further investigation.
There are vast numbers of active springs around the town and it is noticeable that these and related underground watercourses have changed the pattern of surface discharge; so much so that in each of the recent major flood events (1998, 2007 and most recently December 2020), the associated flooding within and without the town has significantly worsened, flooding properties and land that has not seen such volumes of water in previous decades. Should planning applications proceed for sites BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006, further evidence is needed on such matters.

Object

VALP Further Main Modifications

FMM103

Representation ID: 4103

Received: 07/02/2021

Respondent: The Buckingham Society

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Although we support the inclusion of this requirement, to be “effective”, these principles must lead to a more up to date evaluation of the sites referenced above, evidence for which is totally lacking and which, considering local flooding history, must be brought to bear before these sites are considered as firm allocations.

Full text:

FMM059

BUC043 (Moreton Road, Phase III)
The Society has consistently opposed the inclusion of this site in VALP. It did not form part of the development plan in the adopted Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and a previous application was rejected at appeal by the Planning Inspectorate. It cannot deliver sustainable housing growth, as can be understood from the many objections to the planning application validated on 11th February 2020 and without major infrastructure mitigation, no development is possible within the plan period.
Pollution: It is acknowledged that the relative high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries a severe risk of pollution since current waste water treatments are at capacity and necessitate major works to prevent pollution. The inclusion of “reference to consultation with the water and sewerage undertaker” does not adequately mitigate against anticipated pollution.
Transport:ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
3.If the modelling is predicting a 25% increase in flows eastwards from the Moreton Road/High Street junction, the A422 will be subject to long queues at the approaches from both Stratford Road and Mill Lane*.
4.Why is it assumed that all traffic emanating from site BUC051 will flow through the town centre? The Brackley Road (A422 westwards) is a likely route, leading as it does to the Silverstone Enterprise Zone.
5. Both BUC043 and MMO006 are approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic. By contrast, site BUC051 could initiate an attractive, flat, pedestrian/cycle access via the riverside walks.
6. There is equally (if not worse) significant on street parking along the Moreton Road further exacerbating the queuing traffic from an easterly direction.
* Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM003

Buckingham is expected to accommodate additional growth (2,177 houses) without any indication of the associated infrastructure that will be required to service this growth.
Sustainable growth is not justified without sustainable transport links. This requires public transport that is easily accessible without the use of the car. In the light of the recent confirmed financial support for the East-West Rail link, which will offer a real alternative to the car, the Society calls for a re-directed balance of housing towards Winslow. The reduction of dwellings stated in FMM006 (27) should be re-instated in Winslow, and the increase in Buckingham (10) diverted to a more sustainable location.

In the Inspector’s Interim Findings, it is noted that ”growth in the north of the district would lead to increased lengths of commuting flows” and that this is contrary to the NPPF, paragraph 34, which seeks to “ensure that developments which generate significant movement are located where the need to travel will be minimized”.

ED245 Policies Map

Please note this is neither a ‘support’ or ‘object’ matter. It is simply an observation, which leads to the conclusions set out under other responses from The Buckingham Society to this consultation.
Policies Map
It is noticeable when examining the Policies Map for Buckingham and the neighbouring settlement of Maids Moreton (page 5) that allocations BUC043 and MMO006 are located at the furthest edges of Buckingham and Maids Moreton respectively and distanced by some margin from the main employment areas.

The reserved site for Buckingham’s additional cemetery site is not shown. This is a commitment within the Buckingham Neighbourhood Development Plan and marked ‘F’ on Fig.4.2.

FMM072

D-MMO006 Land east of Walnut Drive and west of Foscote Road
Maids Moreton has been wrongly categorized as a “medium” village. For a settlement of a lower order with acknowledged, major transport restraints, the proposed growth of 170 dwellings on this site, now compounded by an additional 12 dwellings on MMO005 (FMM107) is not sustainable. The insertion of the words “at least” further undermines the sustainability of this site. Contrary to FMM067, the village is not “moderately well served with services and facilities”, having only 4 of the 6 criteria cited as a minimum number to qualify as a “medium” village. And, even if it WAS a “medium” village, “at least 170 houses” is in total conflict with FMM015, Policy S2 (h): “growth in medium villages will be at a scale in keeping with the local character and setting. It is also in direct conflict with NPPF, Paragraph 34, since the “significant” movement that will be generated by 170 dwellings outside the settlement boundary of a small village cannot be minimised.
One can observe the ludicrously unbalanced nature of this allocation in FMM068, noting that no other ‘medium’ village is expected to accommodate more than 37 dwellings.
Pollution
As noted under FMM059, the high growth strategy at Buckingham and Maids Moreton carries an unacceptable risk of pollution owing to the inadequacy of waste water treatment in the area.
Transport
The SA Addendum report (ED246 9.12.4) considers the “at least 170 houses” to add a further degree of constraint since it is acknowledged that a “larger site at a lower order settlement” will generate significant vehicular movement contrary to NPPF, paragraph 34.
Maids Moreton is approached from the town centre via a steep hill, making cycle access difficult and, with limited footpath access at historic pinch points, interaction between cars and pedestrians will be problematic.
ED257 Buckingham and Maids Moreton VALP Allocations
This document appears to be produced by Buckinghamshire Council in response to the conclusions reached by Jacobs’ (ED255), Additional Buckingham Modelling Report (produced in October 2020).
ED257 focus’ on the withdrawal of BUC051, using the calculations carried out by the recent additional modelling by Jacobs. The modelling methodology used focus’ on the impacts at the two town centre junctions (Moreton Road/Stratford Road/Market Square and West Street/Bridge Street/Market Square). The report concludes that the impact of traffic emanating from BUC043 and MMO006 combined (300 dwellings) is less than that might be generated by BUC051 (125 dwellings). The Buckingham Society believes this is disingenuous for the following reasons:
1. Alternative routes for BUC046 cannot be compared to the so-called “alternative routes” for BUC043 and MMO006 combined.
2.Figs 2-5 – 2-8 indicate traffic flows from BUC043 and MMO006 using the principal village roads of Avenue Road, Mill Lane* and Main Street. This “alternative” route has been deemed unacceptable and there are mitigation measures proposed to discourage any use of these routes.
*Mill Lane is also referred to as ‘College Farm Road’.

FMM096 and FMM103

Policy I4 Flooding
(e) and (i)Noting the changes in FMM103 to “ensure no increase in flood risk on site or elsewhere such as downstream, or upstream receptors, existing development and/or adjacent land” , The Buckingham Society considers that development on the scale envisaged in BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006 would see a significant increase in surface water discharge and lead to even greater flood risks within the Great Ouse catchment area. Calculations for floodplain compensation and volume-for-volume compensation up to the 1% annual probability (1 in 100) are no longer adequate.

FMM096 requires “a new requirement to include detailed modelling of any ordinary watercourses within or adjacent to the site, where appropriate, to define in detail the area at risk of flooding and model the effect of climate change.” This is an important proposal as it can be the case that small streams and ditches shown by the nationally available flood risk dataset to be associated with surface water flood risk can be found to be associated with fluvial flood risk upon further investigation.
There are vast numbers of active springs around the town and it is noticeable that these and related underground watercourses have changed the pattern of surface discharge; so much so that in each of the recent major flood events (1998, 2007 and most recently December 2020), the associated flooding within and without the town has significantly worsened, flooding properties and land that has not seen such volumes of water in previous decades. Should planning applications proceed for sites BUC043, BUC046 and MMO006, further evidence is needed on such matters.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.